Tag Archives: battery

Fort Worden

After walking around the town in Port Townsend, we drove a short distance to check out Fort Worden.  This base is now turned over to the community and the base buildings are used for a variety of enterprises.  The whole area is a state park so we renewed our annual pass (it hadn’t been needed when we were going nowhere!) and talk a walk up to the old gun emplacements.

One of the things I like about these old installations in the state parks is that they are almost unchanged other than the guns having been removed.  There is no fencing and so you can wander around and climb the ladders up on top if you chose (and you can fall off the edge if you aren’t careful!).  It looks much like it would have a century ago.  The only thing now is that a lot of trees have grown up where once there would have been open views.

We wandered along the rows of concrete works and read about the different batteries and who they were named after.  There were large iron rings set in the walls which caught our eye and these were used for mounting block and tackle to allow the guns to be hauled in to place.  On a sunny day the whole place felt very relaxing to walk around but I imagine the concrete structures were a lot less pleasant on a damp and cold winter’s morning.  Some interesting history to check out.

Battery Gun

The battery at Fort Casey showed up in this previous post.  At the time I showed the general layout but I didn’t show the details of some of the machinery.  One of the guns that was still in place was in good condition and the markings from its manufacture were still clearly seen.  The location of the manufacturer and the date when it was made are there to see while the rifling of the barrel shows up well.  Given the age of the gun, it is in excellent condition.

Remains of Another Battery

I mentioned our trip to Fort Ward in this blog post.  The fort was designed to protect the harbor at Bremerton.  Therefore, it would not be silly to assume that there had been some form of armaments here.  Just like our explorations of the Marin headlands here and Baker Beach here, it turns out that there was a gunnery battery covering the entrance to the harbor.  The guns are long gone but the concrete emplacements are still in place.  The ground has clearly done its best to try and reacquire control of things.  Doorways to lower levels are now partially filled in with earth with just the tops of the doors still showing above ground level.

Battery Chamberlain

AE7I0023.jpgOur visit to Baker Beach included something I hadn’t realized was there. The coast around the entrance to the Golden Gate is dotted with old gun batteries and it turns out that Baker Beach is another location. This gun emplacement is called Battery Chamberlain. While the concrete installations are still pretty much intact, the majority of the battery is long gone. However, one of the gun positions has been preserved and the gun is installed.

AE7I0030.jpgI took a quick look around while one of the guys who looks after things was working on the gun mechanism. He was changing the elevation of the gun and working on the mechanism that aligns the gun. I was able to peer down the barrel and take a look at the rifling. Apparently they run tours periodically but I just took a quick mooch around before heading on my way.

AE7I0034.jpg

Needles Battery

C59F0701.jpgI posted some shots of the Needles in this post. The rocky outcrops are not the only thing of interest, however. The strategic location of the cliffs and the importance of some of the military facilities in the waters approached via the Needles mean a fort was constructed overlooking the entry to the Solent during the Victorian era. Large guns were mounted on the top of the cliffs to deal with any enemy that might come.

C59F0712.jpgIn the end, no enemy came. However, when the First World War came, there was again a need to protect the approaches. The existing location was not suitable for the size of guns then in use so a new battery was built a little higher up on the cliffs. As with the first one, it stood guard but never engaged any enemy.

C59F0758.jpgIn the middle of the 20th century, the location again found a use. Britain had a space launcher development program with the rockets being developed at Saunders Roe in nearby East Cowes. The location on the cliff tops, a long way from most population areas, with nothing but sea below and no overlooking locations for prying eyes meant it was an ideal location for secret programs. A couple of test stands were built for the rockets to be mounted for testing purposes.

C59F0797.jpgNow everything is decommissioned and is open for the public to view. The location on top of the cliffs is very cool anyway but, if you are an engineer type like me, the test facilities are even better. The bunkers and control rooms are worth a look and one of them even has the equipment recreated in cardboard. That might sound strange but it has been done well and even includes a cardboard coat hanging up on the wall. It is a very innovative approach to reproducing what had been taken apart long ago.

Nike Missile Battery

wpid9032-AU0E4617.jpgAt the height of the cold war, the possibility of large waves of Soviet bombers attacking the United States was considered high.  Defending the major cities and defense installations was a high priority.  The result was one of (if not the) most expensive defense programs ever.  The Nike missile program was an air defense system developed by the US Army.  Intended to replace the anti-aircraft gun batteries that were considered incapable of defending against jet aircraft, the goal of Nike was to take out incoming aircraft before they were able to drop thermonuclear weapons on the US.  Since the range at which nuclear weapons could cause devastation was high, interception far away from the target was the goal.

wpid9028-AU0E4569.jpgSeveral different missiles were developed as part of the Nike system.  Two if these missiles were the Ajax and the Hercules.  Ajax was the first of these two to be developed.  It introduced analog computing and tracking of both the target and the missile with the aim of bringing the missile to a successful interception.  The range of Ajax was relatively limited and large number of batteries was deployed around the major cities and defense installations.

wpid9020-AU0E4521.jpgMeanwhile, the Hercules missile was undergoing development.  It introduced a far larger booster (actually four of the Ajax boosters strapped together), a larger sustainer motor and new warheads including conventional and nuclear options.  The longer range and greater intercept capability of the system meant that fewer batteries were required to achieve coverage and they could be slightly further out from the area being protected.  With a range of approximately 100 miles, the Hercules missile could reach its target in approximately 90 seconds.  The enormous booster gave it a phenomenal acceleration.  By the time the tail of the booster reached the point where the tip of the missile had been on the launcher, the missile was already supersonic.

wpid9024-AU0E4538.jpgWhile Hercules had a notional capability against ballistic missiles, the move away from bombers meant the system was more vulnerable a technology advanced.  Ultimately, as part of arms limitation treaties, it was decommissioned as part of the anti-ballistic missile systems.  While hundreds of installations had once been in service across the United States and other countries, virtually nothing of them now remains.

wpid9036-AU0E4634.jpgThe only relatively intact location is just outside San Francisco on the Marin Headlands.  Located in a National Park, SF-88 opens to the public most Saturdays.  The last of over a dozen installations in the San Francisco area, it has preserved the core infrastructure of the installation even if it is condensed into a smaller area that was the case when it was operational.  The facility has a search radar and a tracking radar on display.  The search radar was used to identify the targets initially.  Then two tracking radar were used to carry out the attack.

wpid9026-AU0E4543.jpgThe first tracking radar would lock on to the target.  The second would track the missile as it was outbound.  The missile did not guide itself.  It received command guidance from the ground.  The two tracking radar would feed data to the analog computers that controlled the system.  It would then determine the guidance parameters to be transmitted to the missile.  The missile had four antennae on board – two to receive and two to transmit.  It would then make course corrections based on the signals received.  It would initially boost to very high altitude before arcing over and homing in on the target.  The aim was to detonate just ahead of the target to either provide a cloud of fragments into which it would fly or, in the case of the nuclear warheads, to obliterate it.  Even if the nuclear warhead detonated too far away to disable the aircraft, the electromagnetic pulse was considered likely to render the weapons inoperative.

wpid9022-AU0E4530.jpgThe control systems are on display in metal cabins above ground.  These systems were considered mobile if required, hence them not being buried.  The same was not the case for the missile bunkers.  They are underground with hatches to the surface through which the missiles would be raised and lifted into the near vertical launch position.  These facilities are still in place and the tour includes the chance to go underground, see a selection of Hercules missiles on the launch racks including one that is ready to lift.  When the guide has finished providing an explanation of the missiles and their usage, a climb back up out of the bunker allows you to see the missile being raised up out of the ground and into its launch position.

Only one missile could be fired at a time since the control system could only manage the tracking of one missile.  However, four launchers were part of the battery so multiple engagements could take place and batteries elsewhere in the area could also engage.  Once the missile had finished its flight, another could be loaded to go.  However, the large booster did leave its mark.  While it was scheduled to be jettisoned shortly after launch and to fall out to see, the intense heat could set fire to surrounding debris and the guides also talk about some falling propellant still burning as it came down.  Not a good place to be.  The sound of launch was also intense, even when in protected environments.

wpid9030-AU0E4584.jpgNo launches ever took place within the United States of deployed missiles.  However, regular launches were undertaken by crews for training.  These were carried out at White Sands Missile Range with the crews deploying there periodically to practice actually firing the missile.  These missiles obviously did not have the nuclear warheads but were aimed at incoming target drones, some examples of which are also part of the installation.

The Marin Headlands are full of military installations long retired.  Gun batteries designed to protect the Bay Area from naval assault are common.  However, the Nike Installation SF-88 is a unique example of some more modern weaponry that was located all around San Francisco with most people being totally unaware it was there.  A visit to see this amazing place is well worthwhile if you are in the area.